Le MondeQuand les chercheurs en sciences du climat « fact-checkent » les articles de presse
"globalement, l’honneur est à peu près sauf pour les journalistes. Les textes les plus trompeurs épinglés par Climate Feedback sont en effet généralement des tribunes rédigées par des personnalités extérieures aux organes de presse."
Think ProgressHow To Find Out How Accurate Your Favorite News Site Is On Climate
"“I think [Climate Feedback] is a really powerful thing. This is such a manipulated topic,” said Jeff Chanton, Florida State University. Climate change has indeed been seen as one of the worst examples of “false balance” in the press."
The New York Times Dot EarthScientists Build a Hype Detector for Online Climate News and Commentary
"the most relevant use of the Hypothesis tool so far is by Climate Feedback, through which a large (and hopefully growing) network of scientists studying climate change and related subjects is applying a layer of external peer review and a reliability rating to news articles and commentary on global warming."
GristScientists are fact-checking climate journalism now
“Here’s an open industry secret: Environmental and climate journalists are disseminating scientific information to the public, but most of us aren’t scientists. Neither are the fact-checkers.”
The GuardianClimate scientists are now grading climate journalism
"We argue that scientists have a moral duty to speak up when they see misinformation masquerading as science. [...] You can help them make their voices heard. We invite you to stand with us for a better internet. We invite you to stand with science."
Big ThinkClimate Feedback Keeps Mainstream Media in Check, Seeks Funding on IndieGoGo
"Climate Feedback's website shows us trends in the media community. Websites which were once in high-standing in my own mind quickly fell from the pedestal."
Media Matters for AmericaCoalition Of Scientists Takes Novel Approach To Grading Accuracy Of Climate Change Coverage
"The approach Climate Feedback employs is unique in several respects. It borrows from the peer review process used to evaluate scientific research papers, ensuring that media coverage of climate science receives a similar level of scrutiny."
ObserverCan annotating text online straighten out our collective reasoning?
"The scientists found each other through an organization called Climate Feedback, powered by Hypothesis. [...] It is hard to argue that this isn’t annotation at its best. Each note deepens the conversation, leads to additional sources and provides meaningful context."
Fast CompanyAre We Finally Ready To Annotate The Entire Internet?
"Even in some very prominent outlets there are sometimes inaccuracies, and it can be very hard to know what is right, because you can hear one thing and then the opposite from one day to the next"
Science CareersCritiquing climate coverage
“I’ve looked for other ways to engage with science in the public sphere, and found either they don’t exist or will take more time and energy on my part,” Moon says. “But Climate Feedback has been a really positive experience.”