Topics:
Articles tagged with
This quick check study suggests that the information panels applied by YouTube are highly unlikely to have the desired effect of connecting users to authoritative information on topics prone to disinformation.
Summary Examining a source’s track record and editorial practices can be a useful guide in gauging the credibility with which…
A study of accounts that have repeatedly published popular tweets linking to known misinformation shows that their collective popularity has significantly grown (on average, +42% interactions per tweet) since Elon Musk took effective control of the platform on 27 October 2022. These results appear to run afoul of Twitter’s commitments as a signatory of the EU Code of Practice on Disinformation.
ProPublica finds that Google still monetizes many websites and articles that promote harmful misinformation, much of which is in direct breach of its stated demonetization policy. Enforcement of its own rules on languages other than English is particularly lacking.
SUMMARY This investigation, which took place between May and August 2022, shows that a network of German- and English-language Facebook…
Summary of findings The career- and business-oriented social media platform LinkedIn has been absent from the public conversation around the…
Introduction As social media platforms try to tackle the spread of misinformation, their first challenge is the reliable identification of…
Google announced that any content, including YouTube videos, that ‘contradicts well-established scientific consensus around the existence and causes of climate change’ would not be able to earn revenue from Google ads. Our quick experiment shows that the policy is not systematically applied.
Science Feedback has received accreditation from the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) at The Poynter Institute. Previously accredited based on its…
In April 2019, Science Feedback started working with Facebook as part of their fact-checking program. While misinformation currently floods the…