• Climate

Analysis of Ben Carson's climate statements

Posted on:  2015-11-24

See the candidate’s statements annotated by scientists

Guest comments:

Twila Moon: This candidate seems unaware of the vast science on this topic and its basic conclusions that the Earth’s atmosphere is warming.

Michael Mann: The notion that we don’t even know if Earth is warming is pure anti-science. Individual avoided score of zero with the somewhat enlightened acknowledgement that we have “a responsibility to protect our environment.”

Reviewers’ feedback:

Ryan Sriver: Complete ignorance. No attempt to even address the issue.

Emmanuel Vincent:  “We may be warming. We may be cooling.” is inaccurate. All evidence confirm that the temperature of our oceans and lower atmosphere is increasing over the long term.

Rasmus Benestad: The candidate does obviously not understand the science and causes of climate change.

David Battisti: This candidate shows a profound ignorance of the observational records, the climate science.

Kevin Trenberth: Tremendous ignorance.

Victor Venema: Severely misinformed and refuses to inform himself.

 

See the analysis for other candidates

 

Note on the statistical significance of the rating:

The average of the scientists’ ratings is 5 with a 99% confidence interval level of 2-9*, a “Very low”. We estimate that this rating is very robust given that all scientists independently converged on a “Very low” estimation.

* The confidence interval level is based on a bootstrap technique randomly drawing from the set of ratings.

Science Feedback is a non-partisan, non-profit organization dedicated to science education. Our reviews are crowdsourced directly from a community of scientists with relevant expertise. We strive to explain whether and why information is or is not consistent with the science and to help readers know which news to trust.
Please get in touch if you have any comment or think there is an important claim or article that would need to be reviewed.

Tags:

Published on:

Related Articles